"For  moderate Muslim voices to be heard they need to speak out against the Islamists  and the likes of the Brotherhood, not embrace it as the "voice of the people."  It is this tactic that allowed Hamas to come to power in Gaza in  2007. "  --Romirowsky
  
 Where are the  moderates?
Op-ed: Obama in  for rude awakening if he thinks groups like Muslim Brotherhood are  moderate
Asaf  Romirowsky        Ynetnews   2/16/2011  
    In 2008, I had  the opportunity to travel to Tunisia and meet with private citizens and public  officials to discuss American foreign policy towards the Muslim world. It was  fortuitous time to be in a Muslim country. It was during the height of the race  for the US presidency and all three candidates, Obama, Clinton and McCain, were  still in the running. The direction of where the next US president was on the  minds of the local Tunisians as well. 
   
  The overwhelming majority of the individuals I spoke to all saw Obama as  the best thing that could happen to US-Muslim relations. The locals identified  him as the candidate who best understood the Muslim mindset. Furthermore, as far  as the Middle East at large is concerned, Tunisia saw itself as a model for  moderation and believed that they could export this model to the Middle East.  This belief included Israeli-Palestinian relations where Tunisians believed they  could play instrumental role in bringing peace. 
   
 This somewhat naïve sentiment was something I was willing to entertain,  given Tunisian acceptance of its Jewish minority. The Jewish community of Djerba  is today unique in a Muslim country. But it is key to stress here that when  questioned about what Tunisia is doing to promote these aspects of "moderation,"  it was assumed that the global community should "of course" know who and what  they stand for. Moderation was defined by moderates, and the reverse. What it  really meant in terms of attitudes or behaviors could not be quite specified.  
   
 History shows that Tunisian moderation has many sides. Recall for example  that after Israel went into Lebanon in 1982, Arafat and his "kitchen cabinet"  were evacuated from Beirut and with the help of the US were able to set up shop  in Tunis. Sympathy for the PLO and Arafat were great, and in recent decades this  has solidified in Tunisia. One of the major roads is named Yasser Arafat  Boulevard. 
   
 Fast forward three years. Tunisia has been congratulated by Hamas for their  Intifada and for overturning the corrupt Ben Ali regime. Hamas has also called  the Tunisian revolution a "milestone in contemporary Arab history," and has  asserted that injustice can only be countered with sacrifice. "What occurred in  Tunisia confirms that the path of dignity and confronting injustice, aggression  and tyranny is not by solicitation, but by sacrifices and paying the price of  pride and dignity. The Tunisians, who offered dozens of martyrs and hundreds of  wounded, deserve this great achievement." Hamas speaks from experience about  "martyrs" and wounded. 
   
  Hamas went a step further to remind Tunisia of its struggle against French  colonialism in the mid-1900s and the support they have provided to the  Palestinians in their "resistance" against the Israeli "occupation." Hamas  thinks it has seen the future in Tunisia and even more so in Egypt as  illustrated by the approximate 1,000 supporters of Hamas who rallied in front of  the Egyptian representative office in Gaza, waving Palestinian and Egyptian  flags and chanting, "Mubarak, you must leave."Others carried banners in Arabic  and English that read, "The Egyptian people want to change their regime, we must  support and respect that."
   
 The spirit of the Tunisian Jasmine Revolution - or Intifada, depending on  who you ask - has reached the streets of Cairo where the Egyptian proletariat is  driven by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, which 
Hamas grew out of. The Brotherhood  is now one of only two political institutions that would survive Mubarak's  downfall; the other is the military. And if we look at the model established in  the mini-state of Gaza, the security forces, the military and the Islamists,  including the Brotherhood, will increase the fighting or cut a deal, or create  some combination of both. 
    
 For moderate Muslim voices to be heard they need to speak out against the  Islamists and the likes of the Brotherhood, not embrace it as the "voice of the  people." It is this tactic that allowed Hamas to come to power in Gaza in 2007.  The Obama administration is mistaken if it believes that the Brotherhood has any  intention to change its tone or methodology. 
   
  Finally, if the Obama administration truly believes in change in the  region, it is in for a rude awakening if it continues to see the Brotherhood as  that outlet of moderation. It was a mistake to invite Brotherhood to the  president's 2009 Cairo speech and it's a mistake now to believe that this group  is the voice of reason. Internalizing the fact that groups like the Muslim  Brotherhood, Hamas and 
Hezbollah use catch phrases that  seem democratic and then turn them around to promote their own Islamist agenda  should be a given. 
    
 Asaf Romirowsky is a  Philadelphia-based Middle East analyst, a lecturer in history at Pennsylvania  State University and an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Forum 
  
 Source: http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-4029492,00.html