So why are the Palestinians (in whose footsteps CNN is following) so        focused on settlement building? After all, in the disengagement from Gaza,        citizens were moved, homes and synagogues were bulldozed, entire towns and        small cities were leveled. Regardless of what any of us thinks of what        happened in the summer of 2005, the disengagement did at least prove that        when Israeli governments decide to cede land, the presence of towns or        citizens on that land is not an insurmountable impediment.
Why,        therefore, does Mahmoud Abbas not simply say to himself, “I’ll make a        deal, I’ll get a state and that land will be ours eventually,        anyway.
So let the Israelis waste their time and money on roads and        buildings in the West Bank. They’ll bulldoze them, or I’ll inherit them.        Either way, I win.”
ABBAS’S WEAKNESS and his desire to avoid real        compromise are only part of the picture. More important is the fact that        he understands, infinitely better than do many Jews, that the fundamental        impetus at the core of Israeli society is building. More than a country,        the Jewish state is a project – of nation-building, of ingathering, of        Jewish revitalization. Absent those, this enterprise has no        point.
This is the state of the “watchtower and stockade,” those        desperate attempts to build small outposts that were the beginnings of        Jewish resettlement of the Land of Israel. This is the country of the        defiant immigrants who braved their way past British soldiers patrolling        the shores, seeking refuge when no other country would provide        it.
Operation Flying Carpet, which saved the Jews of Yemen, and        Operation Solomon, which whisked the Jews of Ethiopia out of a war zone        and back to their homeland, were all part of this.
These historical        moments sound like romantic evocations of the past, but they are        not.
They are a reminder of what this country still is at its core.        As I was in synagogue on Simhat Torah last week and listened as the verses        of 
Ata Horeita Lada’at were        assigned and sung aloud, I was reminded of this once again. The last five        or six verses, each sung by a different person, were a perfect collage of        who we are. There was an elderly sabra. The next person sang with a        distinctly French accent, another was American, one was clearly Russian        and one was from somewhere in North Africa.
I turned to my son, who        was also listening to all this, and said to him, “Did you hear all those        different accents? It’s the perfect reminder that at the end of the day,        the ingathering of the exiles, is what this place is all about.”
In        our national narrative, building towns and rebuilding a people are        virtually synonymous.
Israelis are divided as to the wisdom of        building in the settlements, of course. But those who “get it” understand        that specific policies at this moment aside, building and rebuilding are        the very oxygen of this society. End the ethos of rebuilding, and you have        rendered this country devoid of its fundamental purpose.
Unlike        many Jews, the Palestinians understand this perfectly. That is why Abbas        has said, even recently and in no uncertain terms, that he will never        recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
The fact that the Palestinian        Charter declares that Palestine will be a Muslim state doesn’t bother him.        For Abbas is motivated not by shame, but by strategy.
Deny Israel        the right to call itself a Jewish state, and there’s no justification for        the Law of Return.
Deny the Jewishness of this country, and there’s        no morally justifiable basis for not admitting tens of thousands – or many        more – Palestinian refugees from Lebanon, ultimately making Jews a        minority here. Make Israel a Hebrew-speaking but ethnically neutral        country, and you have eviscerated it. There would be no point to the        state, no power to its narratives, no passion left to sustain those of us        committed to (re)building it.
ABBAS’S INSISTENCE on the freeze,        even in places like Gush Etzion, Ariel and other blocs which are clearly        not going to be returned, is not about roads or houses, but is but the        first shot across the bow. The freeze is a metaphor for the legitimacy of        the idea of this as the home of the Jews. The issue, he knows, is not        borders, or even security. Most of us know approximately how those will        eventually be settled.
The real issue is whether the world will        acknowledge, almost a century after the Balfour Declaration, that the        Jews, like other peoples, have a right to a homeland. Sadly, on that        issue, there is much less international consensus than there used to be.        We are in much worse shape than we were a decade or two ago. And given the        direction in which matters are moving, time is not on our        side.
Abbas, the Palestinians and even CNN get all of this. The        question that matters, however, is whether we do – and what we will do to        ensure that Jews, and others across the world who might sympathize with        us, come to understand what is truly at stake.
The writer is senior vice president of the        Shalem Center in Jerusalem, and the author of Saving Israel: How        the Jewish People Can Win a War that May Never End 
(Wiley), which won a 2009 National Jewish Book        Award. He blogs at http://danielgordis.org.