Pete King's Hearings on Radical Islam in America
By Rabbi Brad Hirschfield Wednesday March 9, 2011
With Rep. Peter King beginning hearings tomorrow, March 10 -- hearings which will examine the issue of radicalization within the American Muslim community, two things should be stated very clearly: Islamic terror is real and so is Islamophobia. Denying the former is a deadly error, but addressing that real and pressing problem in no way necessitates or justifies the latter.
These hearings, if conducted properly, could surface  both of those realities, which are rarely acknowledged in the same places and at  the same time. Too often, in my own experience with both religious and communal  leaders in the American Muslim community, those who are prepared to deal with  the problem of Islamic terror, minimize or altogether ignore the ugliness of  Islamophobia, while those who would have us focus on combating hatred of  Muslims, downplay the linkage between Islam and terror in the world  today.
What we need are people who have the bravery, honesty and compassion  to address both at the same time. At the very least, it would be helpful if  those lining up on both sides of these hearings would focus our attention on  that challenge rather than simply defending King, who has said any number of  outrageous things about Muslims and Islam, or suggesting that these hearings are  simply an excuse for whipping up hatred against Muslims.
While it's certainly true that these hearings could  become the "witch hunt" which some are concerned about. The claim that merely  holding the hearings constitutes such an islamophobic hunt is inappropriate.  
Raising questions, however uncomfortable, does not constitute bias against  the group to whom those questions are addressed, but it does make demands upon  those who raise the questions. They will have to prove that their interest lies  not in showing how a particular faith community is inherently dangerous or  problematic. They will have to demonstrate a willingness not only to see  radicalization about which they are concerned, but also to see where it is  absent and the extent to which the fight against it from inside the Muslim  community has been successful. 
If these hearing proceed as they should, many people  whose knee-jerk reaction is to defend Islam and Muslims as a group, will find  themselves uncomfortable, and so will those people who believe that to see any  Muslim is to see a threat, rather than simply seeing a fellow American who  happens to be Muslim. If the overly simplistic picture typically portrayed by  one side or the other is simply confirmed, then Rep. King will have failed and  should be held accountable for his failure.
Ultimately, if these hearings are successful, America  will be safer and there will actually be greater understanding of American  Muslims and a deeper appreciation of the wide range of beliefs within the  American Muslim community. 
 
