Goldstone Gaza War Report endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council doesn't hold Hamas in violation of humanitarian laws

Quote: "Israel is mentioned explicitly with regards to tens of alleged human rights violations; Hamas is not mentioned in connection with any war crimes."

See: Despite his claims, Goldstone didn’t hold Hamas accountable for terror
By Jonathan Dahoah Halevi


The Hamas de-facto administration and its leaders are never accused of responsibility for terrorism and firing rockets. Rather, nebulous “Palestinian armed groups” are responsible. The theme is repeated in the report’s few references to Palestinian terrorism.

 

Netanyahu: " We want to make peace with the Palestinians and we will"

http://twitter.com/Presidentconf09   Live Twittering in English from Pres. Peres' Conference in Jerusalem.

Live video, but no English:  at: http://twurl.nl/c5jxdd

A must watch.

JCRC: UNHRC endorsement of flawed report demonstrates bias against Israel

The JCRC of the Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines, along with The Jewish Council for Public Affairs, deplores today's U.N. Human Rights Council's endorsement of Richard Goldstone's report on Israel's actions defending itself against Hamas.

Jewish Community Relations Commission of the Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines Contact: Mark S. Finkelstein, Director of Community Relations jcrc@dmjfed.org

The following statement was issued by the Jewish Council of Public Affairs (JCPA), online at www.jewishpublicaffairs.org

JCPA: Goldstone Report Flawed; Demonstrates U.N. Bias against Israel

Posted by JCPA October 16, 2009

NEW YORK - Friday's United Nation Human Rights Council's endorsement of the deeply flawed Goldstone Report is a set-back for peace efforts in the region as it calls into question Israel's right of self-defense, says a leading Jewish advocacy organization.

The Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA) and its Israel Advocacy Initiative (IAI), a joint project of UJC/The Jewish Federations of North America and JCPA, deplores today's U.N. Human Rights Council's endorsement of Richard Goldstone's report on Israel's actions defending itself against Hamas. JCPA notes this is the sixth time the Human Rights Council has singled out Israel in a special session in its three-year existence.

Andrea Weinstein, chair of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, released the following statement expressing dismay with today's vote in Geneva:

"We deplore the United Nation's Human Rights Council decision, which, in effect, condemns Israel for defending its citizens against a terrorist regime. For years, Hamas and other terrorist groups have sought to destroy Israel by firing thousands of rockets, inciting fear and killing innocent men, women and children. After numerous unsuccessful diplomatic attempts to end the attacks, Israel, as any nation under siege, had not just a right, but a duty to protect its citizens.

It is unfortunate that the Goldstone Report will only serve as a rallying call for those who are indifferent to Israel's legitimate security needs and to the search for a lasting peace in the region.

We express our appreciation to those nations, including our own, which stood up against this witch-hunt and opposed this resolution. As this report moves forward within the United Nations, we are hopeful those same nations and others will continue to fight back against an anti-Israel initiative that puts the fundamental principle of self-defense in jeopardy."

-------------------

Commentary on the Goldstone Report: "It looks like law, but it's just politics" by Warren Goldstein, October 14, 2009

Peres: Goldstone Report is a mockery of history

President Peres' reply to the Goldstone Mission Report

16 Sep 2009 President Shimon Peres: "Those in pursuit of peace have justice on their side. Those who monger war will forever be criminals." STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT SHIMON PERES: “GOLDSTONE MISSION REPORT IS A MOCKERY OF HISTORY” The Goldstone Mission report is a mockery of history. It fails to distinguish between the aggressor and a state exercising its right for self defense. War itself is a crime. The aggressor is the criminal. The side exercising self-defense has no other alternative. The Hamas terrorist organization has opened war and perpetrated other horrible crimes. For years, Hamas carried out attacks against the children of Israel, sending suicide bombers into city centers, injuring and killing civilians. They fired over 12,000 rockets and mortar shells at towns and villages with one clear aim - to kill innocent civilians. The report legitimizes terrorist activity, the pursuit of murder and death. The report disregards the duty and right of self defense, held by every sovereign state as enshrined in the UN Charter. Israel withdrew all of its troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip, opened the border crossings and actively supported its reconstruction. The Israeli presence in Gaza was terminated. But after Israel completed its redeployment from Gaza, a murderous and illegitimate terror group violently revolted against the legitimate Fatah leadership, overthrowing it by force. Hamas operatives murdered Fatah leaders, at times throwing them from rooftops in broad daylight. While Hamas continued firing, Israel employed, time and time again, the diplomatic channels, including many appeals to the UN – in an attempt to bring about a cessation of rocket fire. Israel redeployed and terminated its presence in Gaza. Hamas responded with incessant rocket fire aimed at killing children, women and innocent civilians. Instead of building Gaza and caring for the welfare of its citizens, Hamas built tunnels to attack Israel, cruelly using children and innocent Palestinians to hide terrorists and ammunition. Hamas terrorists built rocket launching pads and storage facilities near schools, in mosques and kindergartens. They booby-trapped urban neighborhoods and used Palestinian children as human-shields in order to hide terrorists and war materiel. The State of Israel was forced to defend itself. It acted out of obligation to its citizens, like any sister state in the family of nations would. Israel has been criticized for its actions against Hizbullah attacks from Lebanon and Hamas attacks from the Gaza Strip, as well as for building the security barrier in the West Bank to prevent suicide bombers from entering the country. This criticism did not stop the rockets from hitting the South and the North, nor did it stop terrorists from blowing themselves up in our central cities. IDF operations enabled economic prosperity in the West Bank, relieved southern Lebanese citizens from the terror of Hezbollah and have enabled Gazans to have normal lives again. Those in pursuit of peace have justice on their side. Those who monger war will forever be criminals. Members of the Goldstone Mission would have never compiled such a report if their children resided in Sderot and suffered the terrorism of daily rocket fire.

"The Goldstone Mission is unjust and wanting in truth. It has, therefore, harmed the prospects for peace in the Middle East."

--Warren Goldstein, who has a PhD. in Human Rights Law, is the chief rabbi of South Africa

It looks like law, but it's just politics

Oct. 14, 2009
WARREN GOLDSTEIN , THE JERUSALEM POST excerpt

Much has been written and said about the inaccuracies, shortcomings and the moral inversion of the United Nations Human Rights Council's Mission presided over by Judge Richard Goldstone and his three fellow members. Most critics have understandably addressed the political and military issues involved. It is important, however, also to deconstruct the Goldstone Mission's Report from a legal point of view.

This is so because the report uses the veneer of respectability that comes with legal methodology, and with the presence of an internationally respected judge, to gain credibility. Law is a very powerful weapon to give respectability to contemptible actions and opinions. The South African Apartheid Government was very legalistic in its approach to racial oppression, and was punctilious about promulgating proper laws, and about maintaining a fully functioning judiciary to give the façade of respectability to its repugnant policies.

The United Nations, through its various organs, but particularly through its Human Rights Commission, uses the superficial veneer of law and legal methodology to give credence and credibility to its anti-Israel agenda. The Goldstone Mission is a case in point. Careful analysis reveals that the legalities utilized are merely a cover for a political strategy of deligitimizing Israel. Judge Goldstone claims that the Mission "is not a judicial enquiry [but is] a fact-finding mission."

This is a distinction without a difference. The Mission's Report makes numerous factual findings, and some legal, just as if it were a judicial body.

Why Palestinian Incitement Matters So Much

By Jonathan Rosenblum excerpt

[Palestinian] incitement and demonization [of Israel] are not just one more treaty violation. They reflect the failure of the Palestinians since the beginning of Oslo to create a constituency for peace with Israel, to educate the Palestinian population to the idea of living side-by-side with a Jewish state. Such an education would have included Palestinian leaders telling their people that they too would have to make painful concessions for peace, that all the so-called refugees and their descendants will not return to Israel, that the clock cannot be turned back entirely to 1947 or even 1966. That has never happened. Even worse, there has been no education to accept the existence of Israel in any borders or to renounce once and for all the dream of throwing all the Jews into the sea.